Sunday, January 18, 2015

Captain Richard Narramore (c. 1650 - c. 1698)

 [Note:  significant updates have been made at the end of this article]

Although this blog was supposed to concern itself only with the descendants of Thomas Narramore (c. 1640 - c. 1690), there was another Narramore who swashed and buckled his way across the late 17th-century colonial stage and who now refuses to be ignored.  This is the infamous Captain Richard Narramore, who is commonly supposed to have been the brother of Thomas and the progenitor of the Southern branch of the Narramore family in the United States.  There's also that little matter of piracy on the high seas, which briefly landed him in trouble with the royal governor of Massachusetts in 1687.

In point of fact, I don't happen to believe any of these things about Richard.  He may indeed have been Thomas' brother, but the evidence is at best circumstantial:  they were both about the same age, appeared in Boston records at about the same time, and were engaged in maritime occupations.  The same could probably be said about a large portion of Boston's population at that time, which is another way of saying that their shared surname is the only significant connection between them; the records themselves give no hint of any interaction between them or their families.  On slightly firmer evidentiary ground, rather than being the ancestor of a large and vibrant group of American Narramores, it seems more likely that he was a genealogical dead end.  And as for being a pirate - well, it's a colorful story, but the best (or worst, depending on your point of view) that the records have to say about it is that he didn't exactly hang out with the Sunday-go-to-meeting set.  Probably not unique to a merchant ship-captain of that time and place.

A recent query about Richard on the World Narramore Family Facebook group prompted me to pull together all of the miscellaneous pieces of information I'd acquired on him over the years and to give some thought as to how they might fit together.  To be frank, the facts are few, and how they fit together is anyone's guess.  What follows are the facts I have and the guesses I've made from them.  If anyone has additional facts or different interpretations, please feel free to make use of the comments section.

Richard's first documented appearance in the colonies is in 1676, when Boston records show the birth of a son, John, to Richard and Ann Narramore on September 10th of that year.  As with Thomas and Hannah, no record of Richard and Ann's marriage exists, but also as with Thomas and Hannah, probate records supply key pieces of the missing information.  Specifically, the will of one William Waters, made in Boston in 1684, mentions real estate "which I have already made over to my three daughters for my life".   The daughters in question were Mary, wife of John Sellman; Urith, wife of John Nicks; and Ann, wife of Richard Narramore.  Keep the Nicks name in mind, as it will show up again later.

In November 1678, both Thomas and Richard appear on the list of those who took the Oath of Allegiance to King Charles II in Boston.  For what it's worth - possibly nothing - their names are greatly separated on the very long list.

Richard is in Boston tax records for both of the years 1687 and 1688.  It's hard to say without further research, but it doesn't appear that he lived in close proximity to Thomas (nor, again, is that necessarily significant).

Our first knowledge of Richard's occupation is gleaned from Suffolk county deeds, where he is mentioned in passing as being a ship captain.  Book 14 of the registry of deeds records that one John Bond, as surety for a debt owed to Nicholas Paige, pledged his half-interest in the ketch Sparrow to Paige.  The debt was to be repaid by the last day of May, 1687, or sooner, "if the ketch Sparrow, of which Richard Norrimore is master, returns before that time".

The return of the Sparrow to Boston in the summer of 1687 turned out to be a matter of great interest not just to Messrs. Bond and Paige, but to the royal authorities there as well.  The original records of what befell Captain Narramore and his passengers are to be found in the Massachusetts Archives (the so-called "Felt Collection", after the Rev. Joseph Felt who organized and assembled it), portions of which have appeared in various print sources, but the full story is best told in Dow and Edmond's "The Pirates of the New England Coast 1630 - 1730".  They do such a good job, in fact, that there is no need to attempt to retell it here, and the interested reader is instead simply referred to Google Books.   A reading of the events makes it clear that Richard was never himself suspected of piracy; instead, he was a ship-captain who in at least this one instance tried to make a little extra money on the side by providing discreet passage for a group of shady characters and their very probably ill-gotten gains. It is also interesting to note that two of the supposed pirates were said to have been dropped off at Damaris Cove, an island off the coast of what is now Maine, and the place from which Richard's in-laws hailed.

In any event, nothing of substance ever came of the matter and Richard was soon back at his normal trade.  Boston port records show the departure of the two-gun brigantine Resolution, captained by Richard Narramore with a crew of five, for South Carolina in October 1687.  But it may be that the piracy matter had left a bad taste for Richard in Boston, as the 1688 tax list is the last record we have of him there.

It is also at about this time, or just shortly afterward, that he begins showing up in the records of the then relatively new English settlement at Charleston, South Carolina.  Volume One of The Proprietary Records of South Carolina records a bill of sale from Edward Rawlings of Berkeley County, vintner, to Richard Norramore, mariner, for "a negro woman named Rose"; the sale price being thirty pounds and ten shillings sterling.  The date of the sale appears to have been in late 1690 or early 1691.

On June 15, 1693, Richard Norrimore and William Baker, mariners, sold the ketch Bristol, formerly called the Elizabeth, and "now lying before Charles Towne in Ashly River in Carolina, whereof . . . Richard Abram is now master" for the sum of 150 pounds.  It seems that Richard may have been moving up in the world, going from being a captain of vessels owned by others to a ship-owner himself.  Perhaps flush with this cash, Richard purchased (more of a long-term rental, actually) lots 143 and 144 at "Charles Towne" the following year.  In modern Charleston, these lots front on King Street, and comprise much of the area between Price's Alley and Ladson Street, including Weims Court.

One curiosity here is that although Richard is referred to as "of Carolina" and "of the county of Berkley in the said Province" in these records, his wife Ann seems never to have left Boston.  In any event, there is no record of her in the Carolinas, and in early 1692, right in the middle of the period that Richard was setting himself up in Charleston, we find Ann buying land on Hanover Street in Boston.  This is the last record we have of her until the settlement of her estate, in Boston, in 1700.

Another curiosity from this time period is the marriage of a Richard "Narrennore" and Ann Burden in Barbados in 1691.  Based on the long correspondence in the comments section below, I am pretty well persuaded that "Narrennore" is a mis-spelling of "Narramore", but am doubtful that this was the same Richard.  For all we know, he may well have had a woman in every port, but adultery seems far more likely than bigamy, especially given the close ties between Charleston, Barbados and Boston at that time.  Still, with the death of "Hannah Narrennore" (presumably the now-married Ann Burden) in Barbados early in 1692, there is no further mention of Barbados Richard, so the possibility that he and Charleston Richard were one and the same, though slim, still exists.

Following the ship sale and lot purchase, Richard makes two minor appearances in South Carolina court records, both in 1697.  In the first of these, he is described as "Commander of the Bridgateen Carrolina", while in the second, "cash monies received from Capt. Richard Norramore" are mentioned in an inventory of the estate of Robert Rhimer.  It is at this point that Richard exits from the written record.

Somewhere out on the internet (so of course it must be true) there is a supposed 1725 census of Charleston showing Richard Narramore as living there at that time.  Don't believe it.  Rather than being a 1725 census, it was instead taken from a list that was compiled in 1725 of the owners of the original lots in Charleston.  By 1725, only Richard's ghost would have been walking the streets of Charleston.  The evidence strongly suggests that he died not long after the last (1697) mention of him noted above.

This evidence is buried in amongst the probate records of Suffolk county, Massachusetts, where there is a sadly truncated file containing only a single document:  a petition of Urith Nix, sister of Ann Narramore, "late of Boston, widow", asking that administration of Ann's estate be granted to Ann's brother-in-law, John Dollen.  The petition is dated May 14, 1700.  The simplest explanation is that Richard died in 1698, give or take a few months, and that his widow Ann, who had probably remained in Boston with her sisters' family, herself died shortly afterwards.   That there is no mention of any children in the probate record is not conclusive, but it does tend to support the theory that the couple's only known son, John, was either himself dead or out of contact in England by that time.

It would thus seem that the first Narramore migration to South Carolina was of short duration, lasting only through the 1690s.  By the time of the Revolutionary War, there would be a new family of Narramores, headed by Edward Narramore, in the Kershaw District of the state, but that line's migration has now been definitively traced as being southward from North Carolina, where a William Narramore (probably Edward's father) can be found in records going back to the 1750s.

[Update:  10/31/2020]  So, it appears that Richard may not have been a genealogical dead-end after all.  A commenter who is the 7th-geat-grandson of a William Axson (1675 - 1733/4) of Charlestown SC notes that on June 17, 1730, William made a deed of gift to his son Thomas, chairmaker, of Towne lots 143 and 144, which his wife Mary had inherited from her brother, Richard Narramore.  These are the same lots that Captain Richard Narramore had originally purchased nearly 40 years earlier.  Based on this and information supplied by an earlier commenter, it now seems likely that Richard and Ann Narramore had at least three children:

  • Richard.  Probably born c. 1670, married Ann Burden (or Hannah Borden) in Barbados in 1691.  She died there the following year.
  • John.  Born in Boston in 1676.  Possibly died young; possibly the London shipwright "originally of Boston" who shows up in English Admiralty Court records in 1697/1698.
  • Mary.  Probably born 1675 - 1680.  Married William Axson of Charlestown, SC, with whom she had at least one child, Thomas.  Died in Charlestown in the early 1730s.

This also seems to me to give more credibility to an alternate reading of the evidence:  namely, that the Richard Narramore who begins showing up in South Carolina and Barbados records in the early 1690s is actually the son of Richard and Ann (Waters) Narramore of Boston.  At the very least, it seems to provide a better explanation as to why the widow Ann Narramore remained in Boston. 

17 comments:

  1. Your first comment! I think that "Richard Narrennore" is appropriately "Narramore" and nothing more that a clerical copying error. The use of script was almost exclusive, and lower case "n" could be easily mistaken for an "M" for the unsuspecting/untrained eye. We see this all the time where the records were handwritten and transcribed by LDS people. When I published my findings on the St.John/Santken family in THE Register (NEHGS), the will of the progenitor, Christopher "Zanshone", was somehow transcribed as "Shrimpton Zankoth", right out of Sponge Bob.

    Now, the marriage between this Richard Narramore (for argument's sake)and Ann Burden occurred in 1691 on Eleuthera Island, Barbados. In 1687 when the Ketch Sparrow headed back into Boston, according to Dow and Edmonds it was returning from...Eleuthera Island, Barbados.

    I think that it could be our Richard, given dates and geography as well as ship routes. Whether or not this has an impact on progeny is completely unclear but it opens up the possibility.

    But if we were to accept that, then we have to deal with the entry of Anne Narramore, widow in 1697. In my estimation, Richard (and Thomas) would have been born ~1650, as the average marrying age of men during that time was 25. Which at 1697 makes him only 47, as a man of the sea with a woman at every port (speculation) he very well could have progeny. I hate to get into the speculation of double marriages and usually err on the side of Occam's Razor- but in this case, I would leave the door open for the possibility that he "died at sea". This is speculation based on the fact that he disappears from the records in Boston entirely, and any ensuing records appear exclusively in the south/Bahamas. More to follow I am sure...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tend to agree on "Narrennore" being a mis-spelling or mis-transcription of "Narramore", although I still doubt that it is the same Richard. Another wrinkle to the whole story is that I recently came across a previously-overlooked Boston record, in which Ann Norramore bought land on what is now Hanover Street, between Cross Street and Gallup's Alley, from John Nicholls in February 1692. Ten years later, this same property ("lately estate of Ann Narramore") was deeded to John Nicholls (likely the son of the original grantor) by Ureth Nicholls, widow, John and Mary Dollen, William and Rebecca Waters, and Caleb and Eleanor Chaed.

      This firmly establishes Ann Waters Narramore in Boston at the same time as Richard was actively establishing himself in Charleston, SC. What to make of all of this, I don't know. Did the couple split their time between the two cities? Or had the couple effectively split, with Richard sowing his wild, bigamous oats at St. Michael in Barbados?

      All I know is that Occam has 5 o'clock shadow.

      Delete
    2. Could you send these records to me? I have tried looking for both the "widow" record and this most current one that you cite.I would love to have them in my records as well.

      Another wild option here is Richard had a son prior to marrying Ann Waters named Richard. naming traditions in England at this time was not to name the first born son after the father, but usually the paternal grandfather, however there are always exceptions (more than makes me feel comfortable). But in my opinion, one: we now know that all Narramores, et al spring from one common ancestor. We have two Richard Narramores tied to Eleuthera at the same time. The fish is beginning to stink.

      Delete
    3. The land record that I mentioned above is from the printed Suffolk Deeds volumes. I can only find these up to a point online; the one referenced above is summarized in Thwing's work, and can be found in the NEHGS databases. I'm puzzled about your comment linking Richard to Eleuthera twice. There is the fateful 1687 visit, and then there is the marriage record to Ann Burden, but that is from St. Michael in Barbados. Speaking of which, as you note below, there was a prolific Burden (or Borden) family there, who seem to have been Quakers, originally from Rhode Island, although I cannot find a specific tie-in to the Ann Burden who married Richard. In looking at the marriage record online, it clearly is written as "Mr. Richard Narrennore" and "Mrs. Ann Burden", but unless I'm mistaken, the book is a later copy as it does not at all seem to be in a 17th-century hand. I also think it's significant that he's referred to in this record as "Mr." and not "Captain", which seems to be his more usual form of address. I do like the theory, though, that this Richard might somehow be related to the Boston Narramores, perhaps a son of Captain Richard. The Boston-Barbados connection was a strong one, and we know, for example, that the Rainsford family was also well-established in both places. The Rainsfords were neighbors of Thomas on what was then known as Clark's Square in Boston, and a Nathan Raynsford was one of the apprentice shipwrights attacked by a Royal Navy press gang in 1697, an attack which nearly carried off his fellow apprentice, John Narramore. Another intriguing possibility, migration patterns being what they were, is that we may see here a progenitor of the William Narramore who first shows up in North Carolina records a generation or so later.

      Delete
    4. Although the entry refers to him as "Narrennore" it is clearly a misinterpretation of the name, as there isn't one listing in any of the databases (Ancestry/FamilySearch/Google) for a "Narrennore" except for this Richard.

      Your point is well taken about "Captain" vs. "Mr.". Interesting though, "Mr." is not used in the colonies in entries such as these unless they are entitled, or landed gentry. It's quite possible that a Captain in Barbados, could have carried the title of "Mr."or even, he was a Captain without a ship.

      In looking at the full citation it does not state that this is a copy of the original. However, the lines in the journal seem to be relatively modern (within the last 40 years) so I agree with you.

      The elder Ann Burden definitely had a close association with England as she traveled back and forth. I cannot be certain as to who this Ann Burden is, however, under a search on Ancestry, "Narrennore" turns up two records, one for Richard, the other for Ann, under the heading "English Settlers in Barbados". I cannot access the full record because I refuse to give Ancestry ship money.

      Delete
    5. A further review of the records in Barbados reveals that the surviving registers were copied in the mid 1800's. I think this one was copied much later, but the fact is, they were not the originals.

      Barbados was colonized by Britain beginning in 1627 (around the year that Ann was born) and most colonists went on to live in the Carolinas,Virginia, and Georgia. Again, our Richard wound up in South Carolina. Boy, a will would be nice, and there must be one somewhere...

      Delete
    6. I came across an entry in the same parish registers (St. Michael, Barbados) stating that Mrs. Hannah Narrenore was buried there on April 28, 1692.

      Delete
  2. To further illustrate my point, here we have "Naramore", Narrowmore", and the obvious copying error "Narramorc"...

    "the new england - Page 402 - Google Books Result
    https://books.google.com/books?id=G2oFAAAAQAAJ
    1851
    19 : 12: 1668; Unite, 5:3: 1671 ; Ebenezer, 4 : 7 : 1673; John, 9 Apl. 1676; Nathaniel, ... Naramore, Thomas ; " This day Ralph Warner & Thomas Narrowmoore arr ... Thomas Narramorc of Boston, fisherman, wf. Hannah, ch. Sarah, b. 26 Sept ..."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Here is the link to the original marriage record for Ann Burden and Richard. His name is definitely spelled "Narrennore"in the register. However,she is entered as "Mrs."Ann Burden- so this is her second or third marriage.

    In running the surname "Narrennore" on Google, it only turns up this record. This is in my opinion, more appropriately "Richard Narramore".

    https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRST-LTS?i=226&wc=M6PQ-8MS%3A218217901%2C218217802%2C218288201%3Fcc%3D1923399&cc=1923399

    ReplyDelete

  4. The first is a link to Mrs. Ann Burden, who left Barbados in 1657 and was one of the "Boston Martyrs".


    https://books.google.com/books?id=MgJeAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA197&lpg=PA197&dq=Ann+Burden++barbados&source=bl&ots=0XMNQ8QyvX&sig=09IcVUDww_h9ftPXAP0sioEMCJg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj8-87F04DNAhXH0iYKHW-qBc8Q6AEIJzAC#v=onepage&q=Ann%20Burden%20%20barbados&
    f=false

    This link might be peripherally significant in providing a road map. Apparently the Quakers of Barbados (and Boston) found suitable living quarters in South Carolina in the 1680's.Could Richard and Ann have had some sort of religious riff?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Austin

    This entry shows us that Mrs. Ann Burden was a bit long in the tooth to have been the Ann Burden that married Richard. But there seems to be some connective tissue holding this together.

    http://marybarrettdyer.blogspot.com/2011/09/little-ice-age-coldest-in-17th-century.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. According to this entry, Ann Burden was not martyred, but returned to Barbados (and possibly England).

    https://books.google.com/books?id=MgJeAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA197&lpg=PA197&dq=ann+burden+barbados&source=bl&ots=0XMNR2UwzV&sig=5cd3QDrinO3ncFTnEzF2KHqYkow&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwihioTt9oHNAhVMbT4KHZ8sARkQ6AEILTAD#v=onepage&q=ann%20burden%20barbados&f=false

    ReplyDelete
  6. In regards to Richard Narramore, 1650-1698. The William Baker mentioned with Richard in the sale of the ketch "Bristol" was probably my 8th great grandfather, 1666-1718. Also, I hope somebody can shed some light on this. Mary Narramore, died about 1732, of Charleston, married William Axson, 1675-1733/34, my 7th great grandparents. Charlestown, SC, July 17, 1730: Deed of gift William Axson to son Thomas, Chairmaker. Property inherited by wife Mary from her brother, Richard Narramore; Towne Lots: #143, #144
    So, are these siblings, Mary and Richard Narramore connected to the Narramores of Boston? Are they Richard Narramore's (1650-1698) children?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anybody having any information on the above comment, please contact Rich Fash at richfash@aol.com

      Delete
    2. This is the first I've heard of this Mary Narramore Axson - and I'm sorry I missed your comment on this last year. It would seem that she is either a previously unknown daughter or sister of the Captain Richard Narramore of Boston and Charlestown. If I find out anything more on the connection, I'll post it here - and ask you to please do likewise. Thanks for passing along this interesting additional piece of the Narramore puzzle.

      Delete
  7. A few weeks ago I came across a family tree I created ten or fifteen years ago and realised that the new discovery went back in time a few more generations that I realised. My existing family tree had been drawn on tracing paper and printed on a vary large sheet of yellow Dialine paper. Dialine paper is light sensitive and over the years, when in a folded state, one surface had been exposed to light and three or four generations had just faded away! The new finding had revealed the 'lost' generations. But to my point. I'm not claiming that these are connected to your Richard and Thomas Narramores but my earliest ancestors were a Richard Narramore married to Matilda (no dates) and their son Richard Narramore (born 1632). They lived in the village of Harberton in Devon, as did the next generations of Narramores until the 1850s when my great grandfather finally moved to Dartmouth, a few miles away. I know no more about Thomas or Richard other than that, except they were almost certainly farmers or farm labourers as this is a farming community.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Although I've absolutely no proof whatsoever, I've always suspected that my Narramore ancestors came from Dartmouth. There was a Roger "Norromore" in Dartmouth at least as far back as the 1590s, and a Samuel Narramore and wife were building a family there in the 1620s. Given the prominence of the name Samuel in the early generations of the Narramore family here and the relative rarity of it at that time in England, it's one of those "definite maybes".

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just reading this now. This gives me some new chum to throw into the harbor! Let me see if I can come up with anything further…

    ReplyDelete